Comments on: Kant Attack Ad http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87 The Secret Clubhouse You Built In Grade School Is On Fire Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:07:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 By: Neil http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-15 Neil Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:42:39 +0000 http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-15 If only America realized that it's grasp on reality was but a paltry fistful of the phenomenal, then maybe we'd have better health care, assholes. I'd like to see Nietzsche's epistemology laid bare for voters frankly; his constant shifting of perspectives leaves him without any platform worthy of the name. If only America realized that it’s grasp on reality was but a paltry fistful of the phenomenal, then maybe we’d have better health care, assholes.

I’d like to see Nietzsche’s epistemology laid bare for voters frankly; his constant shifting of perspectives leaves him without any platform worthy of the name.

]]> By: Isa http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-22 Isa Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:40:56 +0000 http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-22 It's weird that this was on MSNBC and the Onion and whatevers and all you have is one lousy comment. And by "lousy" I mean the quality of the comment wasn't anything special. It’s weird that this was on MSNBC and the Onion and whatevers and all you have is one lousy comment. And by “lousy” I mean the quality of the comment wasn’t anything special.

]]> By: Do philosopher’s laugh? And if so, why? If not, why not? | Robert Sandberg - Indices Rerum - Adding Daily to the General Hullabaloo Among the Spheres http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-592 Do philosopher’s laugh? And if so, why? If not, why not? | Robert Sandberg - Indices Rerum - Adding Daily to the General Hullabaloo Among the Spheres Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:30:14 +0000 http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-592 [...] Kant attack ad [...] […] Kant attack ad […]

]]> By: Do philosophers laugh? If so, why? If not, why not? http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-1033 Do philosophers laugh? If so, why? If not, why not? Sun, 02 May 2010 20:04:45 +0000 http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-1033 [...] Kant attack ad [...] […] Kant attack ad […]

]]> By: Gas Electric Supplier http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-1036 Gas Electric Supplier Sat, 05 Jun 2010 14:37:01 +0000 http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-1036 i acknowledge i acknowledge

]]> By: Magellan GPS Systems http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-1043 Magellan GPS Systems Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:27:35 +0000 http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-1043 Im Canadian. Americans are messed. Im Canadian. Americans are messed.

]]> By: socratus http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-1044 socratus Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:14:09 +0000 http://spoonbot.com/wordpress/?p=87#comment-1044 - What is the Source of the Universe ? Where did Existence come from? ===========================. # Now we have three ( 3) sources of the Universe: Big bang , vacuum and God. Which of them is correct ? About big band and God my opinion is: the action, when the God compressed all Universe into his palm, physicists had named -a singular point And action, when the God opened his palm, physicists had named - the Big Bang =. And about vacuum Paul Dirac wrote: ‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion, is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description of something more complex? ‘ =====================. Best wishes. Israel Sadovnik Socratus =========================. - What is the Source of the Universe ?
Where did Existence come from?
===========================.
#
Now we have three ( 3) sources of the Universe:
Big bang , vacuum and God.
Which of them is correct ?

About big band and God my opinion is:
the action, when the God compressed all Universe
into his palm, physicists had named -a singular point
And action, when the God opened his palm,
physicists had named - the Big Bang
=.
And about vacuum Paul Dirac wrote:
‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? ‘
=====================.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
=========================.

]]>